Gt 1030 Gddr5 Vs Gtx 1050
Price now 290$ Games supported 79% Price now 115$ Games supported 68% Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, simply for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a hereafter computer configuration or upgrading an existing 1. For desktop video cards information technology'southward interface and charabanc (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, motorbus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, information in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you demand some detail engineering for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Not-gaming criterion performance comparison. Annotation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel complimentary to speak up in comments department, nosotros ordinarily ready issues quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing 4 split benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics carte du jour with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a ocean cavern, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. Information technology was discontinued in April 2017, and Fourth dimension Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used 4 tests based on ii scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken send, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level x criterion that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm criterion, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two dissever tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API past Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Water ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, role of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a battle between ii infinite fleets nigh a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is at present superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte criterion combined from 11 dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: five% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 and GeForce GT 1030. Unremarkably measured in megahashes per second. Let's see how proficient the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming criterion results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set up of popular games across different resolutions: +111% −111% +88.9% −88.ix% +80.vi% −eighty.6% +47.8% −47.eight% +54.5% −54.5% −xi.eight% +11.8% +78.3% −78.3% −58.8% +58.8% −29.4% +29.4% +thirteen.three% −xiii.3% +244% −244% +58.8% −58.8% +30.eight% −30.viii% +117% −117% +88.9% −88.9% +65.4% −65.4% +167% −167% +143% −143% +0% +0% +72.seven% −72.seven% +104% −104% +six.3% −6.three% +41.7% −41.vii% +143% −143% +0% +0% +100% −100% +81% −81% +41.7% −41.7% +114% −114% +88.9% −88.9% +80% −lxxx% +88.9% −88.9% +13.3% −thirteen.3% +94.iv% −94.4% +113% −113% +66.vii% −66.vii% +183% −183% +88.9% −88.9% +88.9% −88.nine% +88.9% −88.9% +88.9% −88.nine% +88.9% −88.9% +88.9% −88.9% +88.9% −88.nine% +88.9% −88.ix% +200% −200% +88.9% −88.9% +88.nine% −88.9% +178% −178% +88.9% −88.9% +88.9% −88.9% +88.ix% −88.9% +88.9% −88.9% +88.ix% −88.nine% +88.ix% −88.nine% +88.9% −88.9% +750% −750% +66.vii% −66.seven% +1600% −1600% +88.9% −88.9% +1600% −1600% +88.ix% −88.9% +88.nine% −88.nine% +22.two% −22.2% +143% −143% +88.nine% −88.ix% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 since it shows improve performance. Should you lot nevertheless take questions concerning option between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond. Do you call back we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push near your favorite graphics carte. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 from AMD is Radeon R9 270X, which is slower by 3% and lower past six positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GT 1030 from AMD is Radeon Hard disk 6850 X2, which is nearly equal in speed and college by 3 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 1030: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more than or less close to those reviewed, providing y'all with more than options to consider. Hither yous tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, besides as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 on a calibration of one to v: Here you lot can ask a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGTX 1050 vs GT 1030
Full general info
Place in operation rating 275 448 Value for coin nine.14 10.08 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU code name N17P-G1 N17P-G1 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 25 October 2016 (v years agone) 17 May 2017 (5 years agone) Launch price (MSRP) $109 $79 Current toll $290 (two.7x MSRP) $115 (1.5x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 384 CUDA cores 640 no data Cadre clock speed 1290 MHz 1228 MHz Heave clock speed 1392 MHz 1670 MHz Number of transistors 3,300 million 1,800 1000000 Manufacturing process technology fourteen nm 14 nm Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C no information Texture fill rate 58.xx 35.23 Floating-point performance 1,862 gflops one,127 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support PCIe iii.0 no data Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe iii.0 x4 Length 5.vii" (14.5 cm) 145 mm Height 4.38" (11.1 cm) no data Width 2-slot 1-slot Recommended organisation power (PSU) 300 Watt no information Supplementary power connectors None None SLI options - no information SLI - no data Retentiveness
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB Retentivity bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 6000 MHz Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 48.06 GB/due south Shared retentiveness - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI 1x DVI, 1x HDMI Multi monitor support + no data HDMI + + HDCP 2.ii no information Thou-SYNC support + + Technologies
GameStream + no data GPU Heave iii.0 no data VR Set + + Ansel + no data API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model 6.4 6.4 OpenGL 4.v 4.6 OpenCL 1.ii 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131 CUDA + six.1 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 279 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.85 Gh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.three kh/s 0.11 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 143.76 Sol/due south no data Gaming performance
Full Hd 44 25 1440p 24 21 4K 22 9
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 38 eighteen Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla xvi−xviii ix−10 Battlefield v 56 31 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34 23 Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 xi Far Cry v xvi−18 nineteen Far Weep New Dawn 41 23 Forza Horizon 4 16−xviii 27 Hitman three xvi−xviii 22 Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 fifteen Red Expressionless Redemption two 31 9−10 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27 17 Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 thirteen
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26 12 Assassin's Creed Valhalla xvi−18 9−10 Battlefield 5 43 26 Telephone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 24 nine−10 Cyberpunk 2077 sixteen−18 7 Far Cry 5 16−18 17 Far Cry New Dawn 38 22 Forza Horizon iv 49 24 Hitman iii 16−18 16 Horizon Zero Dawn sixteen−xviii 12 Metro Exodus 17 7 Red Dead Redemption 2 9 9−10 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24 12 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 21 Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 12
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 15 7 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 nine−10 Battlefield 5 36 twenty Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 9−x Far Cry 5 sixteen−18 fifteen Far Cry New Dawn 35 18 Forza Horizon 4 34 16 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 12 Lookout Dogs: Legion 16−18 6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 nine−10 Hitman 3 16−18 9−10 Horizon Goose egg Dawn xvi−eighteen nine−ten Metro Exodus xvi−eighteen 9−x Scarlet Dead Redemption 2 sixteen−eighteen nine−x Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−xviii 9−10
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−eighteen 9−10 Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla 16−eighteen 9−x Battlefield five 27 nine−10 Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 9−10 Far Cry 5 xvi−xviii 9−10 Far Weep New Dawn 25 9−10 Forza Horizon iv 16−18 nine−ten Picket Dogs: Legion sixteen−18 nine−10
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare xvi−eighteen 9−x Hitman 3 16−18 9−10 Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 nine−x Metro Exodus xvi−18 ix−10 Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 16−18 9−x Shadow of the Tomb Raider sixteen−18 2 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15 ix−x
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 16−18 1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 9−10 Battlefield v xvi−18 1 Cyberpunk 2077 16−xviii 9−10 Far Weep 5 xvi−eighteen 9−10 Far Cry New Dawn 11 9−x Forza Horizon 4 16−18 7 Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 9−10 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 17.18 eight.57 Novelty 25 October 2016 17 May 2017 Cost $109 $79 Retention bus width 128 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 384 Retentiveness bandwidth 112 48.06 Thermal pattern power (TDP) 75 Watt thirty Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GT 1030 past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1050-vs-GeForce-GT-1030
0 Response to "Gt 1030 Gddr5 Vs Gtx 1050"
Post a Comment